p. 1−1
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 2−2
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 3−8
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 9−24
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 25−34
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 33−40
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 41−50
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
1 for most of the elements investigated. Most of the hyperaccumulator values belong to Stachys inflata and the indicating values belong to Stachys inflata, Artemisia sp., and Salvia sp.]]>
p. 51−64
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 65−74
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 75−82
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 83−92
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 93−100
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 101−112
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 113−122
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 123−132
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 133−142
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 143−162
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 163−170
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
6.6. By using some of empirical relationship, maximum magnitude of oldest Paleoearthquake calculated about Mw 8.2 that it is unbelievable and show similar to today that occurred five earthquake during short time interval on this fault, occurrence of earthquake in the past on some of time interval have clustering model so that occurred a lot of big earthquake in short time interval that there was not enough opportunity for sedimentation and record of evidences of this earthquake separately. ]]>
p. 171−180
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 181−196
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 197−204
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 205−212
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87
p. 213−230
2645-4963
Vol.22/No.87